Payne & Fears’ Business Litigation attorneys are skilled in representing businesses in state, federal and administrative forums, building a remarkable record of success for our clients. Our goal is always to represent our clients efficiently and effectively to achieve the best results on their behalf.
What makes us different than other law firms is that we understand the unique concerns and issues businesses face. Our attorneys, therefore, do not focus only on the legal view of the matters presented; we focus on achieving the best result for our clients from a legal, economic and public relations perspective. Resultantly, we provide counsel and representation to our clients from before a dispute arises up to and through trial and appeal.
Our focus on providing the best service possible to our clients affords us the opportunity to represent a broad spectrum of clients, including large and small corporations, large and small companies and partnerships, directors and officers of corporations and companies, and individuals. We also serve our clients across a wide range of disputes, including:
As you can see, our Business Litigation attorneys have experienced great success for our clients. We are pleased that you are considering us to assist you and we look forward to working with you.
Ben Nix, Scott Luskin, and Robert Matsuishi of Payne & Fears LLP recently obtained a victory in favor of their client, SpaceX, before the California Court of Appeal which upheld the dismissal of certain claims against SpaceX by an unlicensed contractor.
In Phoenix Mechanical Pipeline, Inc. v. Space Exploration Technologies Corp., No. B269186 (2017 WL 2544856) (Cal. Ct. App. June 13, 2017), a published opinion, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District ruled that plaintiff’...
Payne & Fears client Craftwood Lumber Co. struck a $3 million settlement with Senco Brands Inc. over alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the Junk Fax Protection Act.
In 2014, Craftwood, a regional hardware and lumber chain, sued power tool manufacturer, Senco, in the Northern District of Illinois claiming that between 2010 and 2014 it had been targeted in a “fax blasting” campaign advertising Senco’s air compressors, nail guns and other tools. The cover page of the fax contained the message “Attention...
Payne & Fears secured final approval of the Interline class action settlement from Federal District Judge Amy J. St. Eve in Chicago. Under the settlement, Interline Brands will pay $40 million to an 80,000-member class of its junk fax recipients. The settlement is believed to be the largest junk fax recovery in history. The settlement also breaks new ground by automatically distributing funds to class members based on the number of faxes received, rather than requiring class members to submit claims. Judge St. Eve also awarded class...
On December 16, 2014, following a week-long bench trial in September, Payne & Fears LLP obtained judgment in an action where it successfully defeated a $2.25 million equitable mortgage claim and obtained a $1.7 million award in favor of their client who was an intervening plaintiff. Thomas L. Vincent and Scott O. Luskin from Payne & Fears secured the trial victory and judgment.
The Second Appellate District, Division Two affirmed the summary judgment ruling obtained by Payne & Fears LLP attorneys in an Unruh Act case for Trump National Golf Course in Palos Verdes, California.